Only the references (technical and professional ability) are decisive for the assessment of suitability.
The information and evidence listed under TL are used to assess the references. A maximum total of 1,000 points can be achieved here. The proofs PL and WL are not evaluated qualitatively.
The evaluation of technical and professional ability is carried out in a relative comparison of the applicants with each other on the basis of the following scale/grade levels. The maximum number of points achievable is multiplied by the weighting factor (percentage) achieved in each case:
- 100% = very good: Applicant meets the requirements with regard to the suitability criterion to the very highest degree,
- 80% = good: Applicant meets the requirements of the suitability criterion to the highest degree,
- 60% = fully satisfactory: applicant meets the requirements of the suitability criterion to a high degree,
- 40% = satisfactory: applicant satisfactorily fulfills the requirements with regard to the suitability criterion,
- 20% = sufficient: the applicant meets the requirements of the suitability criterion to a just sufficient degree.
In the range between 0% and 100%, intermediate grade levels can be formed (10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 90%) to take into account a tendency towards the higher grade level in each case. An evaluation of a suitability criterion (technical and professional ability) with 20% or less would correspond to a complete non-fulfillment of the respective suitability criterion, which would result in the exclusion of the participation application (knock-out criterion).
These are suitability criteria, not award criteria.
If several bidders achieve the same total score and the number of bidders exceeds the planned number of bidders to be invited to negotiate, ZAL reserves the option to draw lots for the negotiation procedure among the remaining bidders with equal scores.