Verfahrensangaben

Design, Development, engineering, manufacturing, shipment, installation and testing of an Anti-Cryostat set-up for application in magnetic field measurement of SIS100-Quadrupole Units at the magnet test facility at FAIR.

Detailed Scope, see Detailed Specification Document

The competent reviewing authority is Vergabekammer des Bundes [transl.: Federal Public Procurement Tribunal] Villemombler Straße 76 53123 Bonn Tel.: 0228 9499-0 Fax: 0228 9499-163 Email: vk@bundeskartellamt.bund.de Website: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Kontaktdaten/DE/Vergabekammern.html Candidate/ Bidder is requested to clearly identify those sections of the tender that contain a trade or business secret. If Bidder fails to do so, the Public Procurement Tribunal may, in the case of a review procedure, assume that Bidder has agreed to have these documents inspected (§165 para. 3 GWB). As Awarding Authority, FAIR is obliged to make the tender file available to the Public Procurement Tribunal immedi-ately when initiating a review procedure (§ 163 para. 2 cl. 3 GWB). Candidates/ Bidders have a right to expect the contracting authority's compliance with the Bidder-protecting provisions re: the tender procedure (§ 97 para. 6 GWB). If Candidate/ Bidder interested in the contract considers that Bidder's rights have been infringed through failure to comply with award regulations, the infringement must be reported to FAIR within ten calendar days (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 no. 1 GWB). Infringements identifiable on the basis of the announcement or the award docu-ments must be asserted against FAIR within the deadline for submission of tenders specified in the announcement (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 nr. 2 - 3 GWB). If FAIR informs Candidate/ Bidder that FAIR is unwilling to redress its complaint, it is possible to file an appeal for review with the aforementioned Public Procurement Tribunal within 15 days of receipt of the notification (§ 160 para. 3 cl. 1 no. 4 GWB). Bidders whose tenders are not to be considered for the award will be informed prior to the award according to § 134 GWB. A contract may only be concluded 15 calen-dar days after this information has been sent by FAIR. In the case of transmission by fax or electronic means, this period shall be ten calendar days. It commences on the day after dispatch of the information by FAIR. After this period has expired, a sur-charge is possible, even if the deadline is not passed according to § 160 para. 3 GWB. An application for review would therefore have to be delivered to FAIR by the Public Procurement Tribunal before the expiry of the deadline according to § 134 GWB in order to prevent a surcharge. According to § 135 para. 1 and 2 GWB, the ineffectiveness of a commission can only be established if it has been asserted in the review procedure within 30 calendar days of the conclusion of the contract but not later than six months after the conclusion of the contract. If the contracting entity has published the award in Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union [transl.: Official Journal of the European Union], the period un-enforceability shall end 30 calendar days after announcement of the publication of the award in the Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union. Information pursuant to Art. 13 GDPR on the processing of your personal data within the scope of our business relationship is available at: www.gsi.de/data-protection

The evaluation of the offers will be processed according to price-quotient-method.

Price: 30 %
Performance: 70 %

Performance criteria:
Technical concept and material: 50 %
Components Procurement: 10 %
Delivery Plan / Schedule: 40 %

The detailled description of the evaluation process and of the performance criteria is found within the document "special application conditions"

GSI/FAIR reserves the right to make a one-off additional request for documents within a period to be specified in the additional request letter in accordance with § 56 VgV.
However, applicants cannot rely on a subsequent request. Ultimately incomplete requests to participate will be excluded (§ 57 Para. 1 No. 2, Para. 3 VgV).

Supporting documents:

* The tender
** By means of self-declaration:
- 4. Self-declaration of suitability pursuant to Sections 123, 124 GWB: Self-declaration of possessing the knowledge pursuant to Sections 123, 124 GWB is incorrect and that the cases mentioned therein do not apply - FAIR preprinted form
- 5. Act Regulating a General Minimum Wage (Mindestlohngesetz - MiLoG): Declaration as per Section 19 (3) MiLoG - FAIR preprinted form

Description of three comparable reference projects, including the project data asked for on the FAIR preprinted form.

With the following minimum requirements for the references: The bid-der's offer will only be accepted if the following experience is proven beyond doubt by means of a detailed description of at least 3 references from the last 5 years:
a) Experience in design, development and manufacturing (or on-site monitoring of the manufacturing process) of cryogenic systems.
b) Experience in development and manufacturing of cryostat systems made